Friendship with those who fail to become co-revolutionaries must be eliminated. The revolutionary ideology, once installed in the mind, bust be the sole regulator of all human relationships. Those who refuse to undergo the same 'installation,' however much you may love them, are no longer to be trusted. Jefferson himself complained of this loss. There were excellent people among the Tories. There are always excellent people on both sides. And to adopt an ideology is to take to one side only. This is why even the most justifiable revolution is certain to destroy friendships, families, cross-cultural exchanges and very other nuanced type of human connection. Believe me, this is an inevitable cost.I've been reading this book.
- Dr. Edward Gurtzner on the dangers of revolution, The Brothers K
My dad assigned it to me. He does this sometimes. This passage terrifies me. I am deathly afraid of becoming a partisan, an ideological fool, a sellout for Grand-Idea-X. I know that I am an ideological young man. I have very lofty thoughts about "how things ought to be, dammit." Very often, these ideas come in violent conflict with the realities of the world we live in. When this happens, I find myself shrugging my shoulders and saying, "Well, that's the hope anyway."
I do not want to take to one side only. I do not want to eliminate my friendship with excellent people. I do not want to tear a rift between myself and my friends, family, the ones I love. But, I fear that my dreaminess, my proclivity for what is mystical and beautiful, will draw me into something so brilliant and gorgeous that I will one day find myself surrounded only by like-minded dreamers. I am afraid of dropping my friends and family like so many sand bags as I try to balloon my way to the surface of the sun, spurned on by a passionate community of Icaruses.
Elsewhere in the book the Ivan analogue, Everett, critiques the Alyosha analogue, Peter. More specifically, he critiques Peter's renunciation of his old life, family and baseball, for Buddhism and Harvard. He accuses Peter of ignoring the outer world in preference for the inner world, baseball for Buddha, family for philosophy, earth for nirvana. Everett does not see these things as supplantations, but imbalances. Human beings are made of both, and we often emphasize one or the other based on what comes easiest. He finishes the rebuke with this line, "Obviously, I question his calculations: to slough off half a self in hopes of finding a whole one is not my idea of good math."
We are young. We love our minds and the wonderful things they can do. College taught us how to play with our brains, and gave us the confidence (arrogance?) to do it with impunity. But, systems of thought are still man-made systems, incomplete and simplified. We are revolutionaries, we are 18 year old Buddhists, we are extremists and fundamentalists, one and all. But, most of us will be tempered by time. Most of us will find the world much more complex outside the Ivory Tower, and much harder to explain/critique/deconstruct/analyze/understand than we once believed. I hope I make it there.
